Speaker summary
68% 18 analyzed articles/videos 1,380.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JB Pritzker results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 481.045 hits . Analysis detected 2,949.703 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,380.333 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,420 of 28,364 speakers). This JB Pritzker is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. JB Pritzker
Speaker details
Total words: 1,380.333
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 5.6% BS Score18 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 34.9% 34.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Straw Man: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst