Author summary
57% 2 analyzed articles/videos 534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Neveau results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Recency Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 425 hits . Analysis detected 2,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,787 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,106 of 6,629 authors). This James Neveau is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. James Neveau
Author details
Total words: 2,787
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst