Publication summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WVIK results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 717 hits. Analysis detected 6,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,368 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (282 of 410 publications). This WVIK is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
WVIK
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
⁠1%Brookings1%
⁠1%Capital B News1%
⁠1%Spotlight Delaware1%
⁠1%The Banner1%
⁠32%WVIK (selected)2%
⁠99%Utah Hockey Club13%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 11,368
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos