AP News53%

Federal appeals court upholds Illinois ban on semiautomatic weapons 9%

By Hallie Golden0%

7/10/2026, 12:50:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 341 faulty-reasoning hits from 547 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (19,245 of 21,110 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the article peer group.

Illinois Gov. 
JB Pritzker, center, mingles ahead of the Obama Presidential Center dedication ceremony Thursday, June 18, 2026, in Chicago. 
(AP Photo/Jeff Roberson,File) 
A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld an Illinois ban on semiautomatic weapons, keeping in place a law passed largely in response to a deadly Independence Day parade shooting . 
The ruling by the U.S. 
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturns a lower court decision that found the ban unconstitutional. 
The 2-1 appellate decision found that the Illinois law does not violate the Second Amendment, and its restrictions are “consistent with the principles that underpin our Nation’s tradition of firearm regulation.” 
“Whether to adopt them is thus a decision reposed in our elected representatives, and we reverse,” the appeals court said. 
The majority opinion also pushes back on claims made by the plaintiffs that semiautomatic weapons are not at fault for mass shootings. 
“The undisputed record evidence undercuts that claim, showing that the presence of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines is strongly correlated with the severity of the societal problem,” the opinion states. 
Democratic Gov. 
JB Pritzker said in a post on X that the decision is “a victory in the fight to end gun violence that helps keep our communities safe.” 
The National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearms industry trade association seeking to stop the ban, said that it is disappointed with the decision and plans to ask the U.S. 
Supreme Court to review the case. 
The gun trade group said it agrees with Chief Judge Michael Brennan’s dissent in which he wrote that the country prohibits governments from banning “firearms commonly owned for self-defense.” 
“Because the people have overwhelmingly chosen the AR-15 rifle and its magazine as their weapon of choice, they are protected by the Second Amendment,” the judge’s dissent states. 
The Protect Illinois Communities Act was signed into law in 2023 by Pritzker and bans AR-15 rifles and similar guns, large-capacity magazines and an assortment of attachments. 
It came six months after a 2022 shooting in which a gunman on a rooftop in the Chicago suburb of Highland Park opened fire on a parade, killing seven people and injuring more than three dozen. 
The law prompted immediate pushback from county sheriffs who said they refused to enforce what they considered an unconstitutional law, while gun owners and advocates sued. 
In 2024, a federal judge overturned the ban , leaning on recent U.S. 
Supreme Court rulings that strictly interpret the Second Amendment right to keep and bear firearms. 
The injunction was set to take effect 30 days after the judge’s decision. 
But that same day, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul filed a notice of appeal, which ultimately led to a stay in the injunction. 
Raoul said Thursday’s decision enhances public safety. 
“We have seen the damage that assault weapons and large-capacity magazines can inflict, and these weapons of war have no place in our communities,” he said in a statement. 
Last month, the Supreme Court announced it will consider whether bans on semiautomatic rifles, often called assault weapons, violate the Second Amendment. 
In the fall, the court, which has expanded gun rights , is expected to hear appeals challenging a ban in the Chicago area, which predates the statewide law. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.5%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.4%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Hallie Golden: 1.8%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.3%This article: 5.1%Hallie Golden: 0.6%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.2%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 3.0%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.7%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.2%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 1.0%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 1.1%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 4.9%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.5%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.1%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.4%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Hallie Golden: 0.6%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.1%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.0%Hallie Golden: 1.5%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority9.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.1%Hallie Golden: 0.6%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization5.1%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.7%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.5%Hallie Golden: 2.5%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion11.5%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.1%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.2%Hallie Golden: 1.6%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.1%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.2%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.5%Hallie Golden: 0.6%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.5%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 1.2%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 1.3%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 0.9%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 3.4%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 6.2%Hallie Golden: 0.3%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.2%This article: 5.3%Hallie Golden: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Hallie Golden: 4.9%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

547 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech420writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJB Pritzker • 27 words • 100.0% coverageNational Shooting Sports Foundation • 29 words • 0.0% coverageNational Shooting Sports Foundation • 6 words • 0.0% coverageNational Shooting Sports Foundation • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKwame Raoul • 7 words • 100.0% coverageKwame Raoul • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kwame Raoul

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words28% of attributed speech31% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Politically Left Leaning B+19.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Kwame Raoul: 19.4%19.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.