Speaker summary
71%8 analyzed articles/videos945.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kwame Raoul results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 843.201 hits. Analysis detected 2,461.977 faulty-reasoning hits from 945.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,131 of 28,364 speakers). This Kwame Raoul is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.9% percentile
8.3% BS Score8 analyzed videos945.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.9%21.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate