Speaker summary
71% 8 analyzed articles/videos 945.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kwame Raoul results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 843.201 hits . Analysis detected 2,461.977 faulty-reasoning hits from 945.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,131 of 28,364 speakers). This Kwame Raoul is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Kwame Raoul
Speaker details
Total words: 945.333
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.9% percentile 8.3% BS Score8 analyzed videos945.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 66.7% 66.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.6% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst