ABC News22%

Federal appeals court upholds ban on semiautomatic weapons 16%

By ABC News15% HALLIE GOLDEN Associated Press0%

7/10/2026, 12:50:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 752 faulty-reasoning hits from 609 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.1% and a BS Rank of 16% (18,391 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the article peer group.

Federal appeals court upholds ban on semiautomatic weapons, overturning ruling 
A federal appeals court has upheld an Illinois ban on semiautomatic weapons 
By HALLIE GOLDEN Associated Press 
July 9, 2026, 8:50 PM 
A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld an Illinois ban on semiautomatic weapons, keeping in place a law passed largely in response to a deadly Independence Day parade shooting . 
The ruling by the U.S. 
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturns a lower court decision that found the ban unconstitutional. 
The 2-1 appellate decision found that the Illinois law does not violate the Second Amendment, and its restrictions are “consistent with the principles that underpin our Nation’s tradition of firearm regulation.” 
“Whether to adopt them is thus a decision reposed in our elected representatives, and we reverse,” the appeals court said. 
The majority opinion also pushes back on claims made by the plaintiffs that semiautomatic weapons are not at fault for mass shootings. 
“The undisputed record evidence undercuts that claim, showing that the presence of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines is strongly correlated with the severity of the societal problem,” the opinion states. 
Democratic Gov. 
JB Pritzker said in a post on X that the decision is “a victory in the fight to end gun violence that helps keep our communities safe.” 
The National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearms industry trade association seeking to stop the ban, said that it is disappointed with the decision and plans to ask the U.S. 
Supreme Court to review the case. 
The gun trade group said it agrees with Chief Judge Michael Brennan’s dissent in which he wrote that the country prohibits governments from banning “firearms commonly owned for self-defense.” 
“Because the people have overwhelmingly chosen the AR-15 rifle and its magazine as their weapon of choice, they are protected by the Second Amendment,” the judge's dissent states. 
The Protect Illinois Communities Act was signed into law in 2023 by Pritzker and bans AR-15 rifles and similar guns, large-capacity magazines and an assortment of attachments. 
It came six months after a 2022 shooting in which a gunman on a rooftop in the Chicago suburb of Highland Park opened fire on a parade, killing seven people and injuring more than three dozen. 
The law prompted immediate pushback from county sheriffs who said they refused to enforce what they considered an unconstitutional law, while gun owners and advocates sued. 
In 2024, a federal judge overturned the ban , leaning on recent U.S. 
Supreme Court rulings that strictly interpret the Second Amendment right to keep and bear firearms. 
The injunction was set to take effect 30 days after the judge's decision. 
But that same day, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul filed a notice of appeal, which ultimately led to a stay in the injunction. 
Raoul said Thursday's decision enhances public safety. 
“We have seen the damage that assault weapons and large-capacity magazines can inflict, and these weapons of war have no place in our communities,” he said in a statement. 
Last month, the Supreme Court announced it will consider whether bans on semiautomatic rifles, often called assault weapons, violate the Second Amendment. 
In the fall, the court, which has expanded gun rights , is expected to hear appeals challenging a ban in the Chicago area, which predates the statewide law. 
Iran live updates: US officials say negotiations with Iran to resume 
Maine couple spots a bear chasing a moose calf and helps it escape 
Prince Archie, Princess Lilibet reunite with King Charles in UK 
Taylor Swift paid NYC more than $160k for wedding permit, mayor says 
24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%ABC News: 1.5%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%ABC News: 2.8%ABC News: 3.0%Availability Heuristic16.9%This article: 4.6%ABC News: 0.6%ABC News: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic4.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.9%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%ABC News: 4.7%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect10.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.3%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%ABC News: 1.3%ABC News: 2.4%Optimism Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.1%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%ABC News: 6.8%ABC News: 7.7%Negativity Bias8.4%This article: 4.4%ABC News: 1.1%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 1.3%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%ABC News: 1.2%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.8%ABC News: 2.8%ABC News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.6%ABC News: 2.1%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization4.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.2%ABC News: 2.0%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion9.2%This article: 5.1%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question5.1%This article: 14.6%ABC News: 1.9%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.1%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal2.1%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.6%ABC News: 2.1%ABC News: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.1%ABC News: 2.7%ABC News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote5.1%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.9%ABC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.3%ABC News: 2.2%ABC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice1.3%This article: 3.3%ABC News: 0.7%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination3.3%This article: 5.6%ABC News: 0.4%ABC News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%ABC News: 1.5%ABC News: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.3%

609 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers26%attributed speech449writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageHALLIE GOLDEN • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJB Pritzker • 27 words • 100.0% coverageNational Shooting Sports Foundation • 29 words • 0.0% coverageNational Shooting Sports Foundation • 6 words • 0.0% coverageNational Shooting Sports Foundation • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Brennan • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKwame Raoul • 7 words • 100.0% coverageKwame Raoul • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael Brennan

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words18% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Michael Brennan: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%Michael Brennan: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Michael Brennan: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Michael Brennan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.