Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video609 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HALLIE GOLDEN Associated Press results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,872 of 6,628 authors). This HALLIE GOLDEN Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
HALLIE GOLDEN Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
42%HALLIE GOLDEN Associated Press (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,436
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510041.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos