Author summary
0%10 analyzed articles/videos5,613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hallie Golden results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 1,111 hits. Analysis detected 8,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,452 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (6,144 of 6,244 authors). This Hallie Golden is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Hallie Golden
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
2%Hallie Golden (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 22,452
Article count: 10
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
1.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate