Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dan Petrella results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 4,353 hits . Analysis detected 36,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,702 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Dan Petrella is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Dan Petrella
Author details
Total words: 45,702
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles45.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.6% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst