Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Brennan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 2,034 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,376 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (31,933 of 37,533 keywords). This Michael Brennan is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Michael Brennan
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠15%Michael Brennan (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,376
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

15% percentile
025507510014.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos