Speaker summary
41% 12 analyzed articles/videos 627.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Clayton results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Begging the Question , and Hasty Generalization , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 131 hits . Analysis detected 1,136.217 faulty-reasoning hits from 627.333 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,386 of 28,364 speakers). This Jay Clayton is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Jay Clayton
Speaker details
Total words: 627.333
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 5.7% BS Score12 analyzed videos627.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.6% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst