BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 927 faulty-reasoning hits from 760 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,091 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON  President Donald Trump’s nominee for director of national intelligence, Jay Clayton, is likely to get a friendly reception from lawmakers Wednesday at his confirmation hearing as both parties are eager for him to take over from the acting intelligence chief. 
Both Democratic and Republican lawmakers see Clayton, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, as a relatively safe pair of hands to replace Bill Pulte, a political partisan who came to the job without any clear national security experience. 
The Senate Intelligence Committee will hold the confirmation hearing amid growing concern among Democrats that Trump and his administration could try to use intelligence or law enforcement agencies to interfere with state governments overseeing midterm elections in November. 
A White House task force has collected thousands of pages of documents from intelligence agencies with plans to declassify some of them, providing Trump with a potential opportunity to renew baseless claims about fraud in past elections, NBC News has reported. 
Trump is due to deliver remarks Thursday evening that will focus in part on election integrity and his administration’s findings around the 2020 election. 
Clayton is expected to face questions from Democrats in particular about how he sees the intelligence director’s role with regard to U.S. elections and whether he would be willing to provide unvarnished assessments to Trump. 
He told CNBC last month that the U.S. is “doing an absolutely terrible job” of ensuring the integrity of elections and that “the American people are right to question it.” 
Citing California’s election laws allowing registered voters to cast ballots by mail, Clayton claimed that “it makes the opportunity for fraud so much greater, when that is not necessary.” 
Election experts and California officials say there is no evidence of widespread fraud in California’s elections, as Trump has asserted. 
And as for the 2020 election, no evidence has emerged showing widespread fraud, as Trump has claimed. 
Dozens of lawsuits seeking to overturn the election results were dismissed or dropped. 
Congress created the national intelligence director’s position in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, with the aim of ensuring that information was shared across the country’s spy agencies. 
The director oversees 18 spy services, weighs in on secret intelligence budgets and serves as the president’s principal intelligence adviser. 
Clayton, who spent most of his career as a corporate lawyer, does not have extensive experience in the intelligence world. 
But as a federal prosecutor, he oversaw an office that handles cases with national security implications, including narco-trafficking, terrorism and corruption. 
As U.S. attorney, Clayton oversaw the Justice Department’s indictment of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on drug trafficking charges. 
Maduro has pleaded not guilty. 
Clayton’s office also reviewed many of the Justice Department’s files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after Congress passed a law requiring the release of the documents. 
Republican lawmakers hope to see Clayton confirmed to try to break a deadlock in Congress over an extension of the government’s electronic surveillance authority. 
Democrats have warned that they will not back reauthorizing the spying tool unless Pulte is replaced as intelligence chief. 
Trump nominated Clayton last month but then demanded that the Senate Intelligence Committee call off a confirmation hearing scheduled for June 17 only hours before it was set to take place. 
He said he first wanted Clayton’s successor as the federal prosecutor in New York, James McDonald, to be confirmed. 
The Senate has not yet confirmed McDonald to the powerful prosecutor’s job in New York, but he has been named deputy U.S. attorney to oversee a period of “transition,” according to the Justice Department. 
Senior Democrats, who are often at odds with the White House over Trump’s nominees, have praised Clayton as a positive and more conventional choice. 
Sen. 
Mark Warner, D-Va., the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, has called Clayton “a capable public servant” with the right temperament. 
Trump selected Pulte as acting director of national intelligence in early June to succeed Tulsi Gabbard after she said she was resigning, citing her husband’s cancer diagnosis. 
Pulte earned Trump’s approval as head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, where he launched investigations into the president’s perceived political enemies. 
Trump has said he wanted Pulte to continue to slash the workforce at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence before Clayton takes over. 
While she was director, Gabbard cut hundreds of positions and moved some teams to other intelligence agencies. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.7%Dan De Luce: 0.4%NBC News: 2.1%Confirmation Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Dan De Luce: 2.7%NBC News: 2.9%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 2.6%Dan De Luce: 0.7%NBC News: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.6%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 1.0%NBC News: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Dan De Luce: 3.7%NBC News: 6.4%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Dan De Luce: 1.4%NBC News: 1.8%Optimism Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 1.0%NBC News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.4%Dan De Luce: 9.2%NBC News: 7.0%Negativity Bias16.4%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Dan De Luce: 0.7%NBC News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error2.9%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Dan De Luce: 1.4%NBC News: 1.5%In-Group Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Dan De Luce: 5.0%NBC News: 4.0%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 2.1%NBC News: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Dan De Luce: 0.6%NBC News: 1.3%Recency Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 3.5%NBC News: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.8%Dan De Luce: 0.7%NBC News: 3.2%Appeal to Authority2.8%This article: 2.5%Dan De Luce: 0.6%NBC News: 1.2%False Dilemma2.5%This article: 3.3%Dan De Luce: 0.8%NBC News: 0.5%Slippery Slope3.3%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 3.3%NBC News: 3.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 2.0%NBC News: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.4%Dan De Luce: 2.3%NBC News: 0.8%Begging the Question5.4%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 26.6%Dan De Luce: 6.6%NBC News: 1.8%Unattributed Quote26.6%This article: 3.9%Dan De Luce: 1.0%NBC News: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection3.9%This article: 24.5%Dan De Luce: 6.8%NBC News: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice24.5%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 5.0%Dan De Luce: 6.0%NBC News: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan De Luce: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

760 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers16%attributed speech635writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageNBC News • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageClayton • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJustice Department • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageMark Warner • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

NBC News

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words33% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+77.2 ptsWriter: 22.8%NBC News: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-23.9 ptsWriter: 23.9%NBC News: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%NBC News: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%NBC News: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.