Keyword summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Intelligence Committee results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 600 hits . Analysis detected 3,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,407 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,466 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Intelligence Committee is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Senate Intelligence Committee
Keyword details
Total words: 5,407
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst