Keyword summary
54%2 analyzed articles/videos1,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Intelligence Committee results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 3,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,407 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,466 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Intelligence Committee is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Senate Intelligence Committee
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,407
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate