Author summary
39%1 analyzed article/video760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan De Luce results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 1,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,115 of 6,365 authors). This Dan De Luce is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Dan De Luce
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
52%Dan De Luce (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,040
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.2%9.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos