Topic summary
47% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intelligence Community results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,428 hits . Analysis detected 12,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,738 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,736 of 15,755 topics). This Intelligence Community is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group. Intelligence Community
Topic details
Total words: 13,738
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst