Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Nominations results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 2,114 hits. Analysis detected 11,671 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,428 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,429 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Nominations is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Presidential Nominations
Topic details
Total words: 7,428
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.5%28.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.3%7.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos