New York Times asks judge to quash subpoenas demanding reporters disclose confidential sources 26%

By Jacob Shamsian25%

7/16/2026, 12:13:08 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 1,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 746 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (16,232 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the article peer group.

The New York Times on Wednesday asked a federal judge to quash Justice Department subpoenas to journalists who reported on security flaws in President Donald Trump's new Air Force One plane. 
David McCraw, the paper's top lawyer, called the subpoenas "abusive" and "improper" in a statement. 
"As we set out in our motion, these subpoenas are brought in bad faith to punish The Times for its coverage," McCraw said. 
"They violate the constitutional rights of The Times and its journalists. 
We are going to court to defend our journalists' rights to report freely on the administration and to provide the public with stories that matter." 
The subpoenas were signed by Jay Clayton, the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan and President Donald Trump's nominee for director of national intelligence. 
A spokesperson for Clayton's office didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. 
The five Times reporters who were subpoenaed Friday  Julian Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager, Eric Schmitt, and Adam Goldman  published an investigation the previous day about the security concerns with the new Air Force One, which was donated by Qatar. 
The modified Boeing 747-8 plane lacks the same sophisticated antimissile defense capabilities of the old aircraft, the Times reported. 
The subpoenas require the reporters to testify before a grand jury in Manhattan and initially demanded they appear on Wednesday, the Times previously reported. 
McCraw said he filed the motion to quash under seal due to a court order and is seeking to have the papers unsealed. 
US District Judge Ronnie Abrams  who leads the Manhattan federal courthouse's media access committee  is assigned to oversee grand jury issues this week. 
The subpoenas became a topic during separate Capitol Hill hearings on Wednesday, as senators on the Intelligence Committee questioned Clayton about what Sen. 
Ron Wyden termed a "flagrant attack" on journalists, and Todd Blanche, Trump's pick for attorney general, was asked by a Democratic senator on the Judiciary Committee about "targeting reporters." 
At Clayton's confirmation hearing, Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, asked why he took the unusual step of signing off on subpoenas to journalists. 
Clayton said they were part of "an ongoing national security investigation." 
"I'm happy to talk to you and this committee about our approach with the First Amendment, and our efforts in all cases to limit to the greatest extent possible any intrusion into the operation of the free press," Clayton said. 
Clayton told Wyden that he followed "the process that we were required to follow." 
"I operate by asking my team, 'What do you think?'" 
Clayton said. 
"Any action in this regard, you can be assured, was a consultative exercise with the prosecutors in my office." 
The White House directed FBI Director Kash Patel to oversee the leak investigation into the Times' reporting about Air Force One, according to the Times. 
During Blanche's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which took place at the same time as Clayton's, Sen. 
Peter Welch asked him if he supported Patel's effort to subpoena the Times journalists. 
Blanche told Welch, a Vermont Democrat, that the Justice Department saw the journalists as "material witnesses, just like reporters would be witnesses to a car crash." 
"The question we want to ask them is who provided them with classified national security information, which everybody in this body should want to protect  I would hope," Blanche said. 
A spokesperson for The New York Times declined to comment on Blanche's and Clayton's comments to the Senate committees. 
In an email to the newsroom Saturday, Times Executive Editor Joe Kahn called the subpoenas a "retaliatory abuse of prosecutorial power." 
"This is a naked attempt to intimidate individual reporters and to prevent The Times and other independent news media from doing important reporting protected by the First Amendment," he said. 
"We will mount a full defense of our staff, of course. 
We will also fight to ensure that this blatant effort to suppress coverage of a matter clearly in the public interest in no way impedes accountability reporting of this or any other administration." 
During the Trump administration, the Justice Department has taken a more aggressive stance toward journalists. 
Last year, then-Attorney General Pam Bondi made it easier for prosecutors to obtain search warrants and subpoenas for members of the media by scrapping Biden-era policies that required department officials to weigh alternative ways to obtain the information they sought. 
This story has been updated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%Jacob Shamsian: 2.6%Business Insider: 2.5%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Jacob Shamsian: 1.4%Business Insider: 3.4%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 3.5%Jacob Shamsian: 1.7%Business Insider: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Jacob Shamsian: 14.7%Business Insider: 5.0%Framing Effect13.7%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.8%Jacob Shamsian: 1.7%Business Insider: 0.8%Status Quo Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.4%Jacob Shamsian: 2.3%Business Insider: 3.1%Optimism Bias9.4%This article: 8.6%Jacob Shamsian: 2.1%Business Insider: 1.6%Pessimism Bias8.6%This article: 21.2%Jacob Shamsian: 5.3%Business Insider: 4.6%Negativity Bias21.2%This article: 11.3%Jacob Shamsian: 2.8%Business Insider: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias11.3%This article: 3.1%Jacob Shamsian: 0.8%Business Insider: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error3.1%This article: 3.4%Jacob Shamsian: 0.8%Business Insider: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.4%This article: 8.0%Jacob Shamsian: 2.0%Business Insider: 0.8%In-Group Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Jacob Shamsian: 1.2%Business Insider: 3.0%Halo Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.0%Jacob Shamsian: 1.0%Business Insider: 1.3%Recency Bias2.0%This article: 2.9%Jacob Shamsian: 0.7%Business Insider: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.2%Jacob Shamsian: 3.3%Business Insider: 3.3%Appeal to Authority7.2%This article: 6.0%Jacob Shamsian: 1.5%Business Insider: 1.2%False Dilemma6.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.5%Business Insider: 4.0%Hasty Generalization2.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 1.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.5%Jacob Shamsian: 11.9%Business Insider: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion15.5%This article: 8.4%Jacob Shamsian: 3.6%Business Insider: 0.7%Begging the Question8.4%This article: 16.9%Jacob Shamsian: 4.2%Business Insider: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.9%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.5%Jacob Shamsian: 0.9%Business Insider: 3.6%Anecdotal3.5%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Jacob Shamsian: 0.8%Business Insider: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.4%Jacob Shamsian: 1.3%Business Insider: 1.2%Unattributed Quote5.4%This article: 7.9%Jacob Shamsian: 2.9%Business Insider: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection7.9%This article: 4.6%Jacob Shamsian: 1.1%Business Insider: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice4.6%This article: 3.4%Jacob Shamsian: 0.8%Business Insider: 1.3%Indoctrination3.4%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 4.1%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jacob Shamsian: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

746 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers51%attributed speech368writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 15 words • 100.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageThe New York Times • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDavid McCraw • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJay Clayton • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJay Clayton • 40 words • 100.0% coverageJay Clayton • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJay Clayton • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJay Clayton • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJay Clayton • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePeter Welch • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 26 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Kahn • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Kahn • 30 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Kahn • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Kahn • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Todd Blanche

100%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words15% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Todd Blanche: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.