Author summary
89%1 analyzed article/video1,412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Baratta results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 1,230 hits. Analysis detected 4,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,236 of 6,367 authors). This James Baratta is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
James Baratta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
65%James Baratta (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,236
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 29.0%29.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.6%5.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.8%4.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 29.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos