Speaker summary
38%8 analyzed articles/videos325.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran’s Revolutionary Guard results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Confirmation Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 858 faulty-reasoning hits from 325.5 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,325 of 28,364 speakers). This Iran’s Revolutionary Guard is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.7% percentile
9.7% BS Score8 analyzed videos325.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate