Iran says tankers exploded from Hormuz mines as U.S. strikes continue ⁠79%

By No Author⁠43%

7/17/2026, 11:58:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 72.9% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 478 faulty-reasoning hits from 107 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (4,569 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the article peer group.

Tehran/Washington/Dubai – Iran’s Revolutionary Guard said Saturday that two oil tankers exploded after hitting mines in the Strait of Hormuz, as the United States and Tehran continued to trade drone and missile strikes. 
“An hour ago, two oil tankers, which were trying to pass through the minefield south of the Strait of Hormuz by deceptive American intelligence agencies, exploded and caught fire,” the Guard said in a statement published by state news agency IRNA, without identifying the tankers. 
The Revolutionary Guard also said on state television they “stopped” four ships trying to transit the critical waterway. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 72.9%No Author: 3.1%The Japan Times: 3.5%Confirmation Bias72.9%This article: 10.3%No Author: 1.6%The Japan Times: 1.9%Anchoring Bias10.3%This article: 30.8%No Author: 3.9%The Japan Times: 4.7%Availability Heuristic30.8%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.6%The Japan Times: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 27.1%No Author: 11.1%The Japan Times: 14.3%Framing Effect27.1%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 16.8%No Author: 0.8%The Japan Times: 1.3%Status Quo Bias16.8%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 4.8%The Japan Times: 4.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 2.4%The Japan Times: 3.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 42.1%No Author: 9.4%The Japan Times: 11.5%Negativity Bias42.1%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.1%The Japan Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.8%The Japan Times: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.9%The Japan Times: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 4.9%The Japan Times: 5.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.6%The Japan Times: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 3.0%The Japan Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 42.1%No Author: 3.7%The Japan Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion42.1%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 3.4%The Japan Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 42.1%No Author: 0.6%The Japan Times: 0.5%Burden of Proof42.1%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.6%The Japan Times: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 58.9%No Author: 2.3%The Japan Times: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)58.9%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 30.8%No Author: 5.2%The Japan Times: 4.5%Unattributed Quote30.8%This article: 42.1%No Author: 2.0%The Japan Times: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection42.1%This article: 30.8%No Author: 6.2%The Japan Times: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice30.8%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.3%The Japan Times: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

107 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker90%attributed speech11writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageIran’s Revolutionary Guard • 33 words • 100.0% coverageIran’s Revolutionary Guard • 45 words • 100.0% coverageIran’s Revolutionary Guard • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
96 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Quote-first Misdirection+46.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Iran’s Revolutionary Guard: 46.9%46.9%Unattributed Quote+34.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Iran’s Revolutionary Guard: 34.4%34.4%Biased Writer Voice+34.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Iran’s Revolutionary Guard: 34.4%34.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.