Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Fulton results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 2,807 hits . Analysis detected 20,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,994 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,623 of 6,235 authors). This Adam Fulton is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Adam Fulton
Author details
Total words: 30,994
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles31K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst