Speaker summary
â 41% 16 analyzed articles/videos 3,954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frederick Douglass results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 815.963 hits . Analysis detected 4,162.693 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,954 analyzed words across 16 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of â 1% (27,793 of 28,087 speakers). This Frederick Douglass is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Frederick Douglass
Speaker details
Total words: 3,954
Content count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score16 analyzed videos4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst