Author summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos3,693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abby Zimet results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 5,732 hits. Analysis detected 29,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,340 of 6,629 authors). This Abby Zimet is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Abby Zimet
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠80%Abby Zimet (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,772
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 38.8%38.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 17.0%17.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 26.2%26.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 38.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 26.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 17.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos