Author summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 1,741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tea Troutman results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 1,638 hits . Analysis detected 9,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,223 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,135 of 6,502 authors). This Tea Troutman is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Tea Troutman
Author details
Total words: 5,223
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.6% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 31.4% 31.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.7% 23.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 14.8% 14.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 31.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 14.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst