Speaker summary
74% 14 analyzed articles/videos 2,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francesca Hong results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 505.351 hits . Analysis detected 4,542.225 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,476 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,097 of 28,364 speakers). This Francesca Hong is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. Francesca Hong
Speaker details
Total words: 2,476
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score14 analyzed videos2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst