Publication summary
62% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Journal Sentinel results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,700 hits . Analysis detected 10,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,139 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 29% (294 of 410 publications). This Journal Sentinel is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 16,139
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst