Author summary
71% 2 analyzed articles/videos 916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrienne Davis results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Begging the Question , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 476 hits . Analysis detected 1,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (3,028 of 6,628 authors). This Adrienne Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Adrienne Davis
Author details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst