Publication summary
54% 4 analyzed articles/videos 750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Journal Sentinel results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 1,110 hits . Analysis detected 6,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,044 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 35% (261 of 399 publications). This Journal Sentinel is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 10,044
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst