Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David Clarey results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , False Dilemma , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 1,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,486 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This David Clarey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. David Clarey
Author details
Total words: 1,486
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.6% 8.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.9% 15.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 3.2% 3.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst