Speaker summary
50% 15 analyzed articles/videos 344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fox results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 121 hits . Analysis detected 851.606 faulty-reasoning hits from 344 analyzed words across 15 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,540 of 28,364 speakers). This Fox is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Fox
Speaker details
Total words: 344
Content count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 7.5% BS Score15 analyzed videos344 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 23.5% 23.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 15.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst