Fox News98%

BREAKING: Technical talks will continue with Iran, US official says 85%

7/9/2026, 5:15:36 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.7% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 513 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.1% and a BS Rank of 85% (3,465 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the video peer group.

We begin though with White House correspondent Aisha Hasnie. Good evening, Aisha. 
>> And John, good evening to you. Here at the White House, some breaking news. We have just been given an update on what's been happening with Iran. 
A US official telling us that technical talks will continue with Iran despite those strikes back and forth. And the administration is still committed to finding a resolution. That is coming from the administration even after Iran violated this memorandum of understanding and even as millions of Iranians flooded the streets today in Iran threatening to kill the president. 
Hundreds of mourners dressed in black hold a giant red flag that reads, "We will kill Trump." 
Another group of women hold up puzzle pieces that read, "Killing you is not enough for us. We want to uproot demons." 
And this man holds up a sign that simply reads, "Revenge." 
That is the message Iran is sending tonight on this final day of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's funeral. 
Despite the scenes on the streets, President Trump reveals Iran's leaders are calling him to cut a deal. 
>> They called a little while ago. They want to make a deal so bad. 
I just don't know if they're worthy of making a deal. I don't know that they're going to honor the deal. That's the problem. 
>> As the president mulls whether the US will return to a full-scale military conflict, 
>> knows how to play his hand better than anybody else in the world. 
>> Renewed scrutiny tonight on his security. The New York Times reports it was the Secret Service that urged the president to leave the NATO summit in Turkey aboard the old Air Force One instead of the new Qatari donated plane 
he arrived in, raising questions about whether the plane was retrofitted with sufficient security measures. 
The White House pushing back telling Fox the new Air Force One is a state-of-the-art aircraft that has been fitted with high-level security protocols that ensure the safety of the president and his staff. 
The president did not divulge if there was a specific threat on his life that prompted the plane swap, but he says he is Iran's top target. 
>> I have a threat all the time. I'm number one on their list. 
>> And John, oil prices fell today on the news that Iran has reached out to the president to try to cut a new deal, but straight traffic is still moving slowly. 
A US official tells us the US helped move ships in the double digits in the last 24 hours, but the tracking firm Kepler reports only six vessels crossed today. That is compared to 25 yesterday in the Strait of Hormuz. 
>> Well, we will soon find out if Iran is serious this time. Aishah Hasnie for us on the North Lawn. Thanks, Aishah. 
>> Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full shows streaming now on Fox 1. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.0%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic13.1%This article: 14.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic14.8%This article: 4.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.5%This article: 5.7%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias5.7%This article: 16.0%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect16.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.7%This article: 39.6%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias39.6%This article: 8.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias8.0%This article: 9.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error9.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect9.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias13.5%This article: 4.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 36.1%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority36.1%This article: 6.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma6.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization14.2%This article: 6.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring6.2%This article: 4.7%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon4.7%This article: 41.7%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion41.7%This article: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question1.9%This article: 11.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 17.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof17.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division3.3%This article: 18.7%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal18.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.3%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading6.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

513 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers32%attributed speech350writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 59 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageThe New York Times • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageFox • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageKepler • 41 words • 0.0% coverageAishah Hasnie • 23 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Fox

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words21% of attributed speech97% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.