Author summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Tapp results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 252 hits . Analysis detected 1,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,674 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,622 of 6,628 authors). This Tom Tapp is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Tom Tapp
Author details
Total words: 1,674
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.0% 13.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.3% 7.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst