Author summary
72%1 analyzed article/video628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These A.J. Herrington results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 1,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,198 of 6,350 authors). This A.J. Herrington is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
A.J. Herrington
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
82%A.J. Herrington (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,884
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.1% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.7%3.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.7%18.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.9%4.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos