Speaker summary
34% 14 analyzed articles/videos 901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana White results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 92 hits . Analysis detected 722.766 faulty-reasoning hits from 901 analyzed words across 14 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,021 of 28,364 speakers). This Dana White is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Dana White
Speaker details
Total words: 901
Content count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.7% BS Score14 analyzed videos901 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% No True Scotsman: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst