Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Schmitz results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 610 hits . Analysis detected 3,705 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,235 of 6,628 authors). This Matthew Schmitz is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group. Matthew Schmitz
Author details
Total words: 3,336
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.3% 18.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.1% 8.1% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst