The fights weren’t enough: Stunt bike event also coming to the White House this weekend, report says 16%

By Bruce Golding0%

6/12/2026, 10:10:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 826 faulty-reasoning hits from 598 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32% and a BS Rank of 16% (17,846 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump's 80th birthday festivities are increasingly taking on the feel of a backwoods county fair  with motocross riders now set to perform stunts outside the White House this weekend. 
"Nitro Circus" star Travis Pastrana and at least three other daredevils will show off their skills on Saturday, one day before the UFC’s unprecedented "America 250" cage fights on the South Lawn, The Hill reported Friday. 
UFC CEO and Trump ally Dana White said Pestrana pitched the previously unimaginable idea at a recent "Power Slap" fighting event, according to Fox News. 
"You grabbed me at Power Slap and said, 'I want to do a backflip on the South Lawn of the White House,'" White told Pastrana during a Tuesday video conference. 
"And I said, 'Interesting. 
All right, let me see what I can do.'" 
Pestrana has since said on social media that fellow bikers Ricky Carmichael and Brian Deegan will make death-defying motorcycle jumps with him, according to The Hill. 
The White House confirmed to The Independent that there will be motocross events on the South Lawn on Saturday and that they would be broadcast to the UFC “Fan Fest” at the nearby park known as the Ellipse. 
The UFC has said it's spending at least $60 million to stage Sunday's mixed martial arts matches in an octagon-shaped cage on the South Lawn under a canopy held up by massive, lighted arches called “The Claw.” 
The outdoor arena is festooned with advertising for products including Bud Light beer, the Polymarket online betting platform and Monster Energy drinks, including its "Mango Loco" flavor. 
About 4,300 people are expected to watch the mixed-martial arts matches in person, with as many as 120,000 taking in the spectacle during a remote watch party in a nearby park called the Ellipse. 
Southern rockers the Zac Brown Band are scheduled to play for the “Fan Fest” crowd on Saturday night and also perform the national anthem before Sunday’s fights. 
And a news conference featuring White and the fighters who will square off on Trump's birthday is set for Friday night at the Lincoln Memorial, where the president recently had the Reflecting Pool's basin covered in "American Flag Blue" sealant. 
Last week, the Public Integrity Project, a government watchdog group, sued the National Park Service on behalf of a Vietnam War veteran and a civic activist in an attempt to block the event. 
The Public Integrity Project called it a “corrupt scheme to hand the White House South Lawn and Lincoln Memorial to a private, for-profit sports promoter” and said Trump bought up to $50,000 in shares of UFC’s parent company, TKO Holdings Group, during the spring. 
But a judge on Friday ruled against the plaintiffs, saying they’d failed to show a “substantial likelihood” that they had legal standing to challenge the government and that they would suffer “irreparable harm” if the fights went forward. 
In a court filing, the park service had acknowledged that seven government agencies  including the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Aviation Administration  have “allocated significant resources and manpower” to the event, according to The Associated Press. 
On Thursday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio also signed a cooperation agreement with the UFC to promote youth teamwork and leadership around the world, AP said. 
“We are so polarized,” Rubio said. 
“There are only a handful of things that bring people together in one place at one time, united by their interest in one thing. 
We need more of those.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 4.0%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 1.0%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Bruce Golding: 4.0%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic11.7%This article: 5.4%Bruce Golding: 1.5%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 1.2%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.7%Bruce Golding: 8.4%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect14.7%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.7%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.4%Bruce Golding: 0.6%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.8%Bruce Golding: 1.1%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 1.0%The Independent: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.2%Bruce Golding: 7.5%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias21.2%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 2.8%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 1.4%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 1.1%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.9%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Bruce Golding: 2.1%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.6%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.7%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.7%Bruce Golding: 1.7%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias6.7%This article: 7.0%Bruce Golding: 0.7%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.1%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Bruce Golding: 2.9%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem7.4%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 1.5%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.9%Bruce Golding: 2.1%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority10.9%This article: 4.0%Bruce Golding: 1.9%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma4.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.1%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 5.5%The Independent: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.6%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.3%Bruce Golding: 3.9%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 0.8%Bruce Golding: 1.5%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.8%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 5.4%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.9%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 1.7%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.4%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.0%Bruce Golding: 2.2%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.2%Bruce Golding: 0.9%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote2.2%This article: 5.7%Bruce Golding: 1.8%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.7%This article: 12.0%Bruce Golding: 4.0%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice12.0%This article: 0.8%Bruce Golding: 0.7%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.8%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 1.4%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bruce Golding: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Bruce Golding: 1.0%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.5%

598 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers41%attributed speech350writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 30 words • 100.0% coverageDana White • 4 words • 100.0% coverageDana White • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 38 words • 0.0% coverageUFC • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coveragePublic Integrity Project • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
44 attributed words18% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.6 ptsWriter: 20.6%Public Integrity Project: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Public Integrity Project: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.