Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stunts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 627 hits . Analysis detected 3,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,896 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,098 of 16,310 topics). This Stunts is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Stunts
Topic details
Total words: 6,896
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst