Angela Nikolau and Ivan Beerkus climb Empire State Building and pull off death-defying proposal: The 'Skywalkers' couple's stunt, explained 12%

By Neia Balao0%

7/2/2026, 8:08:14 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 720 faulty-reasoning hits from 528 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,407 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the article peer group.

The couple that climbs a New York City landmark together  gets engaged. 
The two masked climbers who scaled the Empire State Building on Wednesday have been identified as Ivan "Vanya" Beerkus and Angela Nikolau, stars of Netflix's 2024 documentary <em>Skywalkers: A Love Story</em>. 
Beerkus and Nikolau were initially spotted 1,454 feet in the air atop the building's spire, prompting 911 calls to police at around 12 p.m. 
ET, according to NBC New York. 
During their death-defying escapade, the duo, dressed in black, unfurled a large pro-peace banner that read, "When the power of love beats the love of power, the world knows peace." 
After 30 minutes on the spire, Beerkus and Nikolau climbed down onto a perch, where Beerkus dropped to one knee and proposed to Nikolau. 
They proceeded with their descent around 10 minutes later. 
The precarious climb drew even more attention due to rising temperatures in New York City as a dangerous heat wave grips the Midwest and eastern United States this week. 
But Beerkus and Nikolau weren't necessarily caught in the scorching heat from that high up: According to AccuWeather meteorologists, temperatures at around 1,250 feet above ground were about 81 to 82 degrees Fahrenheit, while temperatures on the ground were in the lower 90s. 
Winds at that height were 10 to 15 mph, per the weather forecasting company. 
Beerkus and Nikolau were eventually taken into custody by the New York Police Department, but not before sharing photos of their dangerous climb on Instagram, including one of Nikolau's engagement ring. 
The caption on the joint post simply read, "Empire State Building, New York." 
After reviewing surveillance footage from the Empire State Building, the NYPD determined that the duo appeared to access the spire via the landmark's 102nd-floor maintenance hatch, according to a report from ABC's Eyewitness News. 
The couple faces a series of charges, including burglary, reckless endangerment, criminal mischief, violation of local law, possession of burglar's tools, criminal tampering, criminal trespass and disorderly conduct, according to CBS News. 
Deadline confirmed that the stunt had no connection to Netflix. 
But that didn't stop the streamer from capitalizing on the buzz. 
Also chiming in on social media was the X account for the Empire State Building Observation Deck, which jokingly apologized to Madison Square Garden that it "had to make this week all about me." 
The world-famous arena is where Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's Fourth of July weekend wedding is set to take place, according to a new report from the Associated Press. 
The Russian couple, who began dating in 2016, has gained notoriety for their illegal "rooftopping" adventures. 
The buildings they've previously climbed include the 1,957-foot Goldin Finance 117, China's tallest incomplete skyscraper, and Merdeka 118 in Malaysia, the second-tallest building in the world at 2,227 feet. 
Their climb of Merdeka was documented in <em>Skywalkers: A Love Story</em>, which first premiered at the Sundance Film Festival. 
"It gives me inspiration, it gives me motivation to live," Beerkus previously told the BBC of his thrill-seeking nature, to which Nikolau added, "Rooftopping is my art form." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.1%Neia Balao: 3.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Confirmation Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.2%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 5.1%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.5%Neia Balao: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 3.6%Associated Press: 5.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 1.6%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.3%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 20.5%Neia Balao: 2.3%Associated Press: 7.3%Negativity Bias20.5%This article: 5.3%Neia Balao: 0.7%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Neia Balao: 10.3%Associated Press: 3.8%Halo Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 31.8%Neia Balao: 7.6%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority31.8%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.1%Neia Balao: 3.7%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization5.1%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.5%Neia Balao: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon5.5%This article: 11.0%Neia Balao: 2.5%Associated Press: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion11.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.5%Neia Balao: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.5%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.8%Neia Balao: 2.4%Associated Press: 1.8%Anecdotal7.8%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 1.0%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.2%Neia Balao: 1.3%Associated Press: 2.0%Unattributed Quote7.2%This article: 5.5%Neia Balao: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection5.5%This article: 22.2%Neia Balao: 16.7%Associated Press: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice22.2%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.2%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Neia Balao: 0.6%Associated Press: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

528 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers8.3%attributed speech484writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageNBC New York • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageDeadline • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageIvan "Vanya" Beerkus • 28 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ivan "Vanya" Beerkus

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words64% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ivan "Vanya" Beerkus: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.2 ptsWriter: 24.2%Ivan "Vanya" Beerkus: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Ivan "Vanya" Beerkus: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.