Keyword summary
⁠8%3 analyzed articles/videos893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Empire State Building results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 274 hits. Analysis detected 2,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,803 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (25,643 of 35,675 keywords). This Empire State Building is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Empire State Building
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠29%Empire State Building (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,803
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510028.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos