Author summary
⁠21%2 analyzed articles/videos76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. John Lienhard results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Primacy Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (557 of 6,359 authors). This Dr. John Lienhard is worse (more manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Dr. John Lienhard
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠92%Dr. John Lienhard (selected)8%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 459
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

91% percentile
025507510091.3% percentile
7.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles459 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 23.1%23.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 23.1%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos