Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana White results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 933 hits . Analysis detected 6,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,072 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,841 of 16,562 topics). This Dana White is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Dana White
Topic details
Total words: 8,072
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst