Topic summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana White results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 6,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,072 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,841 of 16,562 topics). This Dana White is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Dana White
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,072
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate