Speaker summary
34% 7 analyzed articles/videos 351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Integrity Project results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 195 hits . Analysis detected 864.984 faulty-reasoning hits from 351 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.2% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,112 of 27,545 speakers). This Public Integrity Project is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Public Integrity Project
Speaker details
Total words: 351
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 12.2% BS Score7 analyzed videos351 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 29.5% 29.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 21.5% 21.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst