Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,638 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katelyn Caralle results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,979 hits . Analysis detected 20,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,371 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,599 of 6,316 authors). This Katelyn Caralle is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Katelyn Caralle
Author details
Total words: 11,371
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.7% percentile 4.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.1% 17.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 9.4% 9.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 10.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst