Fox News98%

‘YOU WOULDN’T BELIEVE THIS’: Dana White reveals ‘incredible’ White House UFC story 14%

7/2/2026, 5:15:19 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 2,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 900 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.2% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,981 of 21,887 videos). This video is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the video peer group.

And with all this World Cup momentum, and America's 250th birthday this weekend, it's all about American pride right now. 
And that's something UFC President Dana White knows a thing or two about, having just put on a major event at the White House. 
And now, we're getting a look at what went into all of it. 
It's part of a new Fox Nation documentary series out today called UFC Fight House: The Making of the Biggest Fight in History. 
Incredible behind-the-scenes footage of the planning, the troubleshooting, and yes, the backstory on that iconic walkout with President Trump. 
We have 1 minute, and when the door opens, you walk. 
Starting the broadcast in 45 [music] seconds. 
4 3 2 Stand by spot 1. 
And joining me now is the man who made it all happen is UFC President and CEO Dana White. 
Dana, thanks for joining us. 
I know you're on vacation, already beginning your 4th of July weekend, probably at a lake house someplace beautiful. 
So, thanks for taking some time out to be with us here today. 
When was it, Dana, 
>> having me. 
>> before you bet, man, before, during, after, 
when was it you realized you had accomplished your vision? 
>> Uh, you know, I thought I think the the Wayans, uh, there were 60,000 people at the Wayans and, uh, everything was running smoothly. 
It was just we knew we were going to get killed by the weather the next night and, uh, but we were ready for that, too. 
>> Yeah, I I was there, Dana. There was there was no problem. There was beautiful weather. 
Um, and by the way, speaking of being there, I can speak firsthand of how beautiful the event was from start to finish. 
Left, right, it did not matter. If you were there, you saw the patriotism and the beauty of that moment of that night. 
Set aside the quality of the fight, the especially the last fight, which was incredible. 
Um, I've heard you say that ticketing was the worst part of this. 
It's always the worst part. 
What's the best part? 
>> Yeah, and it's not ticketing, it's seating. 
It's like if you've ever, uh, done a wedding and you got to seat some, you know, everybody at the wedding, that's what it's like for me every Saturday. 
>> [clears throat] 
>> And the White House was like, you know, times at times 10,000, but everything went smooth that night. 
Everything went as perfect as it could possibly go. 
And I know, listen, this thing that that you're watching on Fox is a documentary. 
If you wrote a script, you wouldn't believe all the things that happen in this thing. 
Literally, the storm is coming to hit the White House and it breaks apart and goes around the White House and the ellipse and continues on. 
>> It's Right. 
>> incredible, unbelievable, and it was an amazing night. 
>> Well, this thing on Fox Nation, which gives a behind-the-scenes on the build-up, as you mentioned, shows a lot of what went into it. 
Let's take a look of what went into it. Let's take a look together at uh President Trump, I believe, with you taking a look at what would end up being the site of the fight. 
>> You could have an arena of 8,000. 
>> Yeah. 
>> Right here. >> Yeah. 
>> And then you could do something there nice. 
>> Yeah. 
>> whether it's stand-up or seats around the fountain. 
>> What do you think your maximum is? 
>> Ri- right now, the current infrastructure [music] that we have that goes to the perimeter right up to the trees is only about 2,500. 
>> It's terrible. 
>> My concept was right smack at the front door to the White House. 
Build it as big as you can. You know, we're a little confined because of trees and these beautiful plantings and everything else. So, it's not easy. 
>> They're going to get the numbers. 
They're going to have schematics. 
They're going to overlay on the field. 
So, you'll be able to see >> amazing thing. You can build it as big 
as you want. There's no problem. 
>> Build it as big as you want, Dana. And 
obviously, you got way bigger than 2,500 
people people there. I mean, what a 
logistical I don't even know if I should call it a hurdle, Dana, because you had the President of the United States greasing the wheels on this thing. 
But what what a an event to pull off. 
>> Well, he was the one that kept pushing us harder and harder to make to be able to get more seats and and to get more people in there. 
He was the one pushing hard on that. And every time he would push, we would try to figure it out. Um 
but I mean, we built a basically a stadium on the South Lawn of the White House. 
And then, I think what we did at the Ellipse is even more impressive. 
I mean, you know, everything that went into that and the amount of people that were over there. Um 
and uh battling the weather, the elements, you know, all the unknown. 
The the event could not have gone 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 22.3%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic22.3%This article: 3.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.2%This article: 3.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.7%This article: 12.1%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias12.1%This article: 15.0%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect15.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias5.9%This article: 4.8%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.8%This article: 6.9%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias6.9%This article: 8.7%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias8.7%This article: 4.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.7%This article: 6.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias6.4%This article: 4.8%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.1%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect12.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect7.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority16.0%This article: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma1.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization3.0%This article: 2.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring2.8%This article: 2.6%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.6%This article: 28.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion28.0%This article: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.8%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division5.4%This article: 15.7%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal15.7%This article: 3.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman3.2%This article: 9.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground1.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 3.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading3.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection1.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

900 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers11%attributed speech803writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageUFC President Dana White • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageUFC President and CEO Dana White • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDana White • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words25% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%UFC President Dana White: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.