Speaker summary
49%7 analyzed articles/videos148.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Caine results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 274.786 faulty-reasoning hits from 148.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.4% and a BS Rank of 40% (17,196 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Caine is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Dan Caine
Speaker details
Total words: 148.333
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
24.4% BS Score7 analyzed videos148.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often