Author summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 2,872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie McCarthy results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 3,574 hits . Analysis detected 28,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,148 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,119 of 6,195 authors). This Charlie McCarthy is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Charlie McCarthy
Author details
Total words: 24,148
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles24.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst