Speaker summary
47% 33 analyzed articles/videos 1,135.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central Command (CENTCOM) results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 565.302 hits . Analysis detected 3,376.302 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,135.333 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,542 of 28,364 speakers). This Central Command (CENTCOM) is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Central Command (CENTCOM)
Speaker details
Total words: 1,135.333
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score33 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 37.0% 37.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst