US attacks Iran for 13th night as Trump threatens ‘bigger’ strikes 41%

By Al Jazeera Staff56%

7/23/2026, 9:43:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 841 faulty-reasoning hits from 708 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,017 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the article peer group.

The United States military has said it bombed Iran for the 13th consecutive night after President Donald Trump threatened more intense attacks on the country amid risk of further escalation. 
The Middle East-based Central Command (CENTCOM) of the US military said that the strikes began at 6.45 pm Eastern time [22:45 GMT] on Thursday. 
The attacks “aimed to hold Iran accountable and diminish threats from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to commercial shipping”. 
Speaking from Tehran, Al Jazeera’s Tohid Asadi said there were reports of explosions on Qeshm Island, adding that blasts were also heard Ahvaz, the capital of Khuzestan province. 
Elsewhere in Khuzestan, Iran’s Mehr news agency reported US missile strikes in the cities of Andimeshk and Omidiyeh with. 
US attacks on a residential neighbourhood in the Iranian port city of Bandar Abbas also injured two people. according to Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency reported. 
Trump had stepped up his rhetoric against Tehran earlier. 
He told the US news website Axios that he may launch the largest strikes on Iran yet after Tehran carried out another wave of retaliatory attacks on US allies in the Gulf, including hitting a telecommunications tower in Kuwait. 
Trump said he was “considering a massive attack” that would be “bigger than ever before”. 
“I am close to making a decision. 
We are all set for it,” Trump said. 
The threat raises the stakes yet again in a weeks-long military confrontation in which the US has attacked Iran for 12 straight nights, including hitting bridges and tunnels, according to Iranian media reports. 
Iran’s retaliatory attacks have rippled throughout much of the Gulf, sparking fears of a worsening energy crisis. 
The spiralling conflict has all but destroyed an interim peace deal signed by the US and Iran last month. 
‘Eye for an eye’ 
Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas Araghchi warned on Wednesday that Tehran would retaliate “an eye for an eye” against any future attacks, including those on Iran’s infrastructure. 
After another night of US attacks on Wednesday, Iran responded with missile and drone attacks on Jordan, Bahrain and Kuwait on Thursday. 
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the attacks in Jordan and Kuwait targeted and hit US military assets. 
The IRGC also acknowledged attacking a telecommunications tower in Kuwait, saying it was in retaliation for US attacks on telecommunications towers in Iran. 
In a statement addressing the Kuwaiti people directly, the IRGC insisted that the US, not Iran, had breached the Gulf state’s “territorial integrity and sovereignty”. 
Later on Thursday, Kuwait said that its Abdali border crossing with Iraq had also come under attack by “hostile drones”. 
“The armed forces’ retaliatory attacks will continue as long as the US attacks on the country’s infrastructure and coastal areas continue,” said the Iranian army’s spokesperson, Mohammad Akraminia. 
Houthis attack Saudi tankers 
Meanwhile, Yemen’s Houthi group further expanded the confrontation on Thursday by firing at two Saudi tankers in the Red Sea, leading to broad international condemnation and a spike in global oil prices. 
“The situation is getting out of control. 
It is teetering on the edge of the unimaginable,” United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told a meeting of the Security Council. 
“One crisis feeds another. 
One escalation triggers the next.” 
The Houthis have declared a blockade of Saudi Arabian ports, destabilising a second key global shipping route: the Bab al-Mandeb Strait. 
The Strait of Hormuz has been effectively shut since the US and Israel launched the war on Iran in late February. 
Reporting from Sanaa, Yemen, Al Jazeera’s Yousef Mawry cited Houthi sources as saying that the facilities of Saudi Arabia’s national oil company Aramco “could become a future target” of the Houthis if Riyadh does not lift its own blockade on Houthi-controlled ports. 
The international oil benchmark Brent crude surged past $100 a barrel on Thursday for the first time in May, in what analysts said could have an even greater impact on the global economy. 
“Much of the world’s spare production capacity has already been used, while strategic and commercial oil inventories are lower than when the war began, leaving the market with fewer buffers against a prolonged supply disruption,” said Janiv Shah, vice president of the Rystad Energy consultancy. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.6%Al Jazeera: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.7%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Anchoring Bias3.0%This article: 8.3%Al Jazeera Staff: 3.0%Al Jazeera: 2.8%Availability Heuristic8.3%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.7%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.5%Al Jazeera: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.6%Al Jazeera: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias6.4%This article: 2.7%Al Jazeera Staff: 10.2%Al Jazeera: 8.5%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.4%Al Jazeera: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.6%Al Jazeera: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.8%Al Jazeera: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.5%Al Jazeera: 2.7%Pessimism Bias10.3%This article: 13.1%Al Jazeera Staff: 10.4%Al Jazeera: 10.3%Negativity Bias13.1%This article: 3.2%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.7%Al Jazeera: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.2%Al Jazeera: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.6%Al Jazeera: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.1%Al Jazeera: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.8%Al Jazeera: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.0%Al Jazeera: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.2%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 4.4%Al Jazeera: 4.0%Appeal to Authority9.0%This article: 4.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.6%Al Jazeera: 1.9%False Dilemma4.0%This article: 9.9%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.9%Al Jazeera: 1.0%Slippery Slope9.9%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.6%Al Jazeera Staff: 3.3%Al Jazeera: 3.6%Hasty Generalization8.6%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.4%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.5%Al Jazeera Staff: 6.6%Al Jazeera: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion7.5%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.2%Al Jazeera: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.4%Al Jazeera Staff: 3.0%Al Jazeera: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.4%This article: 3.2%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Tu Quoque3.2%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.6%Al Jazeera: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.5%Al Jazeera: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.3%Al Jazeera: 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.0%Al Jazeera: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.1%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.1%Al Jazeera Staff: 3.4%Al Jazeera: 2.8%Unattributed Quote14.1%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 2.0%Al Jazeera: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 4.8%Al Jazeera: 4.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.0%Al Jazeera: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 1.3%Al Jazeera: 1.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Al Jazeera Staff: 0.2%Al Jazeera: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

708 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers39%attributed speech434writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 39 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageIslamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) • 19 words • 0.0% coverageIslamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) • 23 words • 0.0% coverageIslamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMohammad Akraminia • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAntonio Guterres • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAntonio Guterres • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAntonio Guterres • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAntonio Guterres • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJaniv Shah • 45 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Janiv Shah

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words16% of attributed speech47% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-14.1 ptsWriter: 14.1%Janiv Shah: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.