Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video67.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Janiv Shah results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Overconfidence Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,198 of 28,364 speakers). This Janiv Shah is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Janiv Shah
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠79%Janiv Shah (selected)67%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 67.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.2% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos67.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos