Keyword summary
74% 38 analyzed articles/videos 10,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 7,932 hits . Analysis detected 63,544 faulty-reasoning hits from 70,332 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (30,946 of 35,686 keywords). This Jordan is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Jordan
Keyword details
Total words: 70,332
Article count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score38 analyzed articles70.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst